In their ongoing mission to help people injured by dangerous drugs and devices the Pradaxa Helpline has launched a Hernia Mesh Hotline. More and more people have been reporting complications from a hernia mesh surgery.
Manufacturers With A Faulty Hernia Mesh Include:
Proceed (Potential)(patch only not mesh sheet)
Hernia Mesh Complications
Mesh sticks together
Tissue or organ perforation
Criteria To Join The Lawsuit
Mesh revision or removal surgery
Get Your Texas Pradaxa Lawyer
Texas Pradaxa Lawyer Network has Texas Pradaxa lawyers ready to help you if you have been injured by Pradaxa extensive bleeding in: Dallas, Houston, Abilene, Amarillo, Austin, Arlington, Beaumont, Brownsville, College Station, Corpus Chrisit, Del Rio, Denton, EL Paso, Fort Worth, Galveston, Houston, Huntsville, Killeen, Laredo, Lubbock, Mcallen, Odessa, San Antonio, San Marcos, Tylor, Victoria, Waco, and Wichita Falls Texas.
Texas Pradaxa Lawsuit Criteria
- Bleeding events leading to hospitalization of the patient.
- Hospitalization can involve blood transfusions, surgery and/or other treatment.
- Admission to a hospital is key.
- Bleeding that causes death before reaching the hospital.
- You cannot be taking another anticoagulant (aspirin, warfarin, Xarelto) and Pradaxa at the time of the bleeding event.
- You cannot have continued taking Pradaxa after a bleeding event while on the drug.
If you have been injured by or lost a loved one due to a bleeding event from Pradaxa contact us today
Get a Pradaxa lawyer today
Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline
Get An Xarelto Extensive Bleeding Lawyer
If you or a loved one took Xarelto for prevention of blood clots and pulmonary embolisms and this resulted in severe injury or death contact Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline.
Xarelto lawyers file Xarelto lawsuits of behalf of victims and their family. They allege that the drug makers failed to properly inform you about severe and life-threatening bleeding risks associated with the drug Xarelto.
Why File An Xarelto Lawsuit
Xarelto lawsuits are consolidated lawsuits for people who have suffered serious health complications after using this prescription anticoagulant. Lawsuits have been filed against drug makers Bayer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson. These lawsuits claim that the drug manufacturers failed to properly inform you about serious and potentially life-threatening risks associated with Xarelto.
What is Xarelto?
- internal bleeding,
- gastrointestinal bleeding
- Brain bleeding
- other severe bleeding events.
Xarelto is a blood thinner approved in 2011 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of blood clots. It is manufactured by Bayer and marketed in the U.S. by Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. If you suffer from atrial fibrillation you may have been prescribed Xarelto because it can reduce the risk of stroke. It prevents blood clots in patients who have undergone knee and hip replacements as well. Clots that move to the lungs, brain and legs can potentially lead to strokes and pulmonary embolism and result in death.
What Is An Xarelto Lawsuit?
An Xarelto lawsuit claims that the drug makers were negligent in failing to disclose these severe and potentially fatal Xarelto bleeding risks. It is not a medical malpractice lawsuit
The IVC Filter Helpline keeps you updated on all the latest news regarding IVC Filter lawsuits and all lawsuits pertaining to products and drugs that claim they will help people avoid blood clots and the resulting strokes or pulmonary embolisms. This includes the Cook and Bard IVC Filters, Xarelto and Pradaxa. All of these have caused serious complication and even death in consumers because manufacturers did not warn of the potential complications. We found this article of interest and are making it available to our readers.
A lawsuit has been filed against Cook Medical by a woman from Texas for injury from the Cook Celect® Vena Cava Filter.
Catherine M. Maxwell, was implanted with a temporary IVC filter at St. David Medical Center in Austin, Texas by Dr. Joseph Imsais on January 8, 2010.
She accuses Cook Medical of negligence for selling a defective medical device and failing to warn about serious risks.
Her case has been centralized with more than 650 similar lawsuits against Cook Medical. The lawsuits are part of a Multi-District Litigation (MDL No. 2570) overseen by Judge Richard Young.
The Celect is a retrievable IVC filter that should be removed within 29-54 days after implantation, according to the FDA. The longer it remains implanted, the higher the risk of complications.
In one study of 27 patients who were implanted with the Celect, all of them had some degree of perforation after 71 days. In another study, Celect was linked to a 43% risk of vena cava perforation after an average of two months.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Indianapolis Division) on August 4, 2016 — Case No. 1:16-CV-2095-RLY-TAB.
If you have been injured by a Cook or Bard IVC Filter fracturing or migrating contact the IVC Filter Lawsuit Helpline. We can help you in: Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, El Paso, Arlington, Corpus Christi, Plano, Garland, Lubbock, Laredo, Irving, Amarillo, Brownsville, and all of Texas
Blood Clot Help Turns To Danger
Drugs For Blood Clot Prevention- Blood Thinners- Dangerous
Xarelto Excessive Bleeding Lawsuits
Blood Clot Capture Surgical Implant- Dangerous
Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits
Cook IVC Filter Lawsuits
Blood Thinners and Blood Clot Capture Devices
Padaxa and Xarelto are both blood thinners with warnings and lawsuits for excessive bleeding and fatalities. The Bard and Cook Inferior Vena Cava filters solve the problem of blood clots traveling to the heart and lungs in another way.
The Bard and Cook Vena Cava filters are surgical implants that capture the blood clots as the move to the heart or lungs. These are not without their complications and side effects. The filter can fragment and pieces can migrate causing severe damage to internal organs,
Bard and Cook Inferior Vena Cava- IVC filters have been the focus of many attorney T.V ads and lawsuits.
IVC Filter Overview
The FDA issued a warning letter to Bard in July 2015 for illegally marketing a device used to remove the Recovery IVC filter, as well as for problems with its Denali IVC filter.
In October 2014, all Cook Medical IVC filter lawsuits were centralized as part of an MDL in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for pretrial proceedings. In August 2015, federal judges centralized lawsuits involving C.R. Bard IVC filters into a Multi-District Litigation (MDL No. 2641) in Arizona under U.S. District .
IVC Lawsuits Are Being Filed For:
C.R. Bard IVC Filter Lawysuits
Recovery IVC Filter (withdrawn in 2005)
G2 IVC Filter
G2 Express / G2X Filter
Cook IVC Filter Lawsuits
If you have been injured by a Bard or Cook IVC filter Contact Us Today
IVC Filters, Vena Cava Filters, Blood Clot Filter lawyers in West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Boca Raton and Deerfield Beach are alerting seniors to the dangers of the Bard and Cook IVC Filters.
IVC filters are implanted to capture blood clots and prevent them from causing pulmonary embolisms and strokes by lodging in the lungs or brain. However, IVC filters have some dangerous side effects and IVC Filter lawsuits are being filed.
Complications include: vein and organ perforation, migration and breakage, broken pieces of filters traveling through the body causing organ damage. IVC filters are meant to be temporary.
Risk of Adverse Events with Long Term Use According To The FDA
AUDIENCE: Emergency Medicine, Surgery
ISSUE: Since 2005, the FDA has received 921 device adverse event reports involving IVC filters, of which 328 involved device migration, 146 involved embolizations (detachment of device components), 70 involved perforation of the IVC, and 56 involved filter fracture. Some of these events led to adverse clinical outcomes in patients. These types of events may be related to a retrievable filter remaining in the body for long periods of time, beyond the time when the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) has subsided.
The FDA is concerned that these retrievable IVC filters, intended for short-term placement, are not always removed once a patient’s risk for PE subsides. Known long term risks associated with IVC filters include but are not limited to lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), filter fracture, filter migration, filter embolization and IVC perforation.
BACKGROUND: FDA reviewed the literature and is conducting quantitative decision analysis modeling to evaluate the change in the risk/benefit profile after retrievable IVC filter implantation over time. More information about FDA’s decision analysis model including risk/benefit implantation time frame suggestions will be made available in an update to this communication as well as in a future publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal.
RECOMMENDATION: FDA recommends that implanting physicians and clinicians responsible for the ongoing care of patients with retrievable IVC filters consider removing the filter as soon as protection from PE is no longer needed.
FDA encourages all physicians involved in the treatment and follow-up of IVC filter recipients to consider the risks and benefits of filter removal for each patient. If a patient has a retrievable IVC filter that should be removed based on his or her individual risk/benefit profile, the primary care physician and/or those providing ongoing patient care should refer the patient for IVC filter removal when feasible and clinically indicated.
If you or a loved one has been injured by a Vena Cava Filter contact our IVC Filter Lawsuit Helpline today.
A family is filing a lawsuit for wrongful death of a loved one due to bleeding from Xarelto. Xarelto is a blood thinner with no way to stop the bleeding once it starts.
Charlene Hibsch filed a complaint on May 10 in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana against Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare AG and Bayer AG, for the wrongful death fo James Hibsch.
According to the Xarelto extensive bleeding lawsuit, James Hibsch was prescribed Xarelto y his bof his physician. Xarelto resukted in severe bleeding May 11, 2014, causing a hemorrhage.
The plaintiff alleges the defendants designed, researched, manufactured, tested, advertised, promoted, marketed, distributed and sold Xarelto, failed to properly investigate, research, study and define the safety of the drug’s profile, failed to adequately test it or provide adequate warnings, failed to disclose the need for dose adjustments, and failed to provide adequate instructions on the drug’s use.
Charlene Hibsch seeks a trial by jury, compensation for all damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, reasonable attorney fees,legal costs and other relief as the court deems proper.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Case number 2:16-cv-04829
Xarelto- Eliquis Bleeding Lawyer
Join Others In a Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, West palm Beach Xarelto Class Action Lawsuit
Eliquis Lawyers Filing Brain Hemorrhage, Internal Bleeding Lawsuits
Get a Xarelto- Eliquis lawyer that understands the product and it’s potential dangers.
Call us and speak to an experienced Xarelto lawyer.
Our Florida Xarelto lawyers have decades of experience.
Florida Brain Hemorrhage Xarelto Lawsuit
Xarelto and Eliquis bleeding symptoms include:
- Unusual bruising or bleeding / hemorrhaging
- Pink or brown urine
- Red or black tarry stools
- Coughing up blood
- Vomiting that resembles blood or looks like coffee grounds
- Bleeding from the gums
- Frequent nosebleeds
- Joint pain or swelling
- Weakness and swelling of the arms, hands, feet, ankles or lower legs.
If you are having any of these side effects see your doctor immediately. It is easy to get a spontaneous brain bleed while on Xarelto . A brain bleed can be fatal. Signs of excessive bleeding or potential complications from Xarelto include
Lawyers Filing Lawsuits For The Serious Side Effects of Xarelto and Eliquis
- death from severe or excessive bleeding
- gastrointestinal bleeding
- stomach pain (ulcers, nausea, heartburn, bloating)
- kidney failure (kidney bleeding)
- hemorrhagic stroke cerebral hemorrhage
- heart attack
- brain hemorrhaging
If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by Pradaxa call the Florida Xarelto Helpline today. We will connect you with a Xarelto Lawyer to discuss your potential Xarelto Lawsuit.
There has been the establishment of a Xarelto multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Louisiana. About 130,000 patients were prescribed Xarelto in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2012, according to the Huffington Post. If you or a loved one have suffered due to Xarelto or Eliquis call the Xarelto Helpline.
Our Phoenix, Tucson, Mesas, Chandler, Glendale, Scottsdale, Gilbert, Tempe, Peoria, Surprise, Sedona, Flagstaff, Prescott, or Xarelto lawyers are filing extensive bleeding lawsuits for people who have been injured or lost a loved..
Arizona Xarelto- Eliquis Extensive Bleeding Lawsuits
Bleeding from Eliquis or Xarelto
File Your Xarelto- Eliquis Lawsuit
If you or a loved one has been seriously injured by Xarelto call the Arizona Xarelto Helpline today. We will connect you with a Xarelto- Eliquis Lawyer to discuss your potential Xarelto or Eliquis Lawsuit.
Bard IVC Filter Helpline
The Bard IVC Filter Helpline has just found out from our IVC Filter lawyers that the IVC blood clot capture filter lawsuits are increasing.
NBC News has just televised a news report about the safety issues associated with the G2 Retrievable IVC Filter. Tje IVC Filter is a blood clot filter marketed by C.R. Bard, Inc. IVC filters, such as the G2 and Recovery filters , are used to prevent pulmonary embolism in patients for whom anticoagulant medications are not appropriate. These wire implants are placed in in the inferior vena cava. This is the body’s largest blood vessel. They catch blood clots before they can travel to the heart and lungs.
IVC Filter Injury
The Recovery IVC filter had been associated with more than 300 non-fatal injuries and 27 deaths before it was replaced with the G2 series. Among other things, the report disclosed a confidential study commissioned by Bard in 2004 which linked the Recovery IVC filter to higher rates of death, fracture and movement compared to its competitors. Like the G2, Bard opted not to recall the Recovery filter, and instead allowed it to remain on the market for three years. Roughly 34,000 devices were sold.
IVC Filter Lawsuits
Court records indicate that at least 72 Bard IVC filter lawsuits involving the G2 and Recovery products are now pending in a multidistrict litigation underway in the U.S. District Court, District of Arizona. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that Bard was aware that the Recovery and G2 IVC filters were associated with high rates of fracture, migration and tilting, which may result in perforation of the inferior vena cava, embolization and other life-threatening complications. (In Re: Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2641)
Get An IVC Filter Lawyer
Contact the Bard IVC Filter Helpline to learn about your rights in joining the IVC Filter Multi District Litigation.