• Texas Pradaxa Lawyer: Get Your Texas Pradaxa  Lawyer Texas Pradaxa Lawyer  Network has Texas Pradaxa  lawyers ready to help you if you have been injured by Pradaxa extensive bleeding in: Dallas, Houston, Abilene, Amarillo, Austin, Arlington,...
  • Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline | Xarelto Lawyers: Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline Get An Xarelto Extensive Bleeding Lawyer If you or a loved one took Xarelto for prevention of blood clots and pulmonary embolisms and this resulted in severe injury or death  contact  Xarelto L...
  • Texas Blood Clot Filter Lawyer Files IVC Filter Lawsuit: The IVC Filter Helpline keeps you updated on all the latest news regarding IVC Filter lawsuits and all lawsuits pertaining to products and drugs that claim they will help people avoid blood clots and the resulting stroke...

Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline | Xarelto Lawyers

Written by Xarelto Helpline on . Posted in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Bard IVC Filter Lawyer, Bard IVC Filter News, Blood thinner lawyer, California-Xarelto-lawyer, Colorado, Connecticut, Cook Ivc Filter lawyer, Dallas Xarelto lawyer, Delaware, Extensive bleeding lawyer, Florida Xarelto Lawyer, Fort Lauderdale Xarelto lawyer, Georgia Xarelto Lawyers, Hawaii, Houston Xarelto lawyer, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, IVC Filter Lawsuit Helpline, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey Xarelto lawyer, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas Xareleto Lawyer, Texas Xarelto Lawyers, Utah, Vena Cava Filter, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington D.C., West palm Beach, West palm beach Xarelto lawyer, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Xarelto, Xarelto Bleeding Lawyer, Xarelto Class Action, Xarelto Death Lawsuit, Xarelto extensive bleeding lawsuit, Xarelto Helpline, Xarelto lawsuit, Xarelto Lawsuit Lawyer, xarelto lawsuit lawyer, Xarelto lawyer, Xarelto Lawyer Alabama, Xarelto lawyers, Xarelto News

Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline

Get An Xarelto Extensive Bleeding Lawyer

If you or a loved one took Xarelto for prevention of blood clots and pulmonary embolisms and this resulted in severe injury or death  contact  Xarelto Lawsuit Helpline. Xarelto lawyers file Xarelto lawsuits of behalf of victims and their family. They allege that the drug makers failed to properly inform you  about severe and  life-threatening bleeding risks associated with the drug Xarelto.

Why File An Xarelto Lawsuit

Xarelto lawsuits are consolidated lawsuits for people who have  suffered serious health complications after using this prescription anticoagulant. Lawsuits  have been filed against drug makers Bayer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson. These lawsuits  claim that the  drug manufacturers failed to properly inform you about serious and potentially life-threatening risks associated with Xarelto.
  • internal bleeding,
  • gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Brain bleeding
  • other severe bleeding events.
  • Death
What is Xarelto? Xarelto is a blood thinner   approved in 2011 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the prevention of blood clots. It is manufactured by Bayer and marketed in the U.S. by Johnson & Johnson’s subsidiary, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. If you suffer from atrial fibrillation you may have been prescribed Xarelto because it can reduce the risk of stroke. It  prevents  blood clots in patients who have undergone knee and hip replacements as well. Clots that move  to the lungs, brain and legs can potentially lead to strokes and pulmonary embolism and result in death. What Is An Xarelto Lawsuit? An Xarelto lawsuit  claims that the drug makers were negligent in failing to disclose these severe and potentially fatal Xarelto bleeding risks. It is not a medical malpractice lawsuit  

Bard IVC Filter For Blood Clots | Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters

Written by Xarelto Helpline on . Posted in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Bard IVC Filter Lawyer, Bard IVC Filter News, Colorado, Connecticut, Cook Ivc Filter lawyer, Dallas Xarelto lawyer, Delaware, Florida Xarelto Lawyer, Houston Xarelto lawyer, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, South Florida Injury lawyer, Tennessee, Texas Xareleto Lawyer, Utah, Vena Cava Filter, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Washington D.C., West palm Beach, West palm beach Xarelto lawyer, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, Xarelto, Xarelto Bleeding Lawyer, Xarelto Class Action, Xarelto Death Lawsuit, Xarelto extensive bleeding lawsuit, Xarelto lawsuit, Xarelto News

Blood Clot Help Turns To Danger

Drugs For Blood Clot Prevention- Blood Thinners- Dangerous

Xarelto Excessive Bleeding Lawsuits

Blood Clot Capture Surgical Implant- Dangerous

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits Cook IVC Filter Lawsuits

Blood Thinners and Blood Clot Capture Devices

Padaxa and Xarelto are both blood thinners with warnings and lawsuits for excessive bleeding and fatalities. The Bard and Cook Inferior Vena Cava filters solve the problem of blood clots traveling to the heart and lungs in another way.

IVC Filters

The Bard and Cook Vena Cava filters are surgical implants that capture the blood clots as the move to the heart or lungs. These are not without their complications and side effects. The filter can fragment and pieces can migrate causing severe damage to internal organs, Bard and Cook Inferior Vena Cava- IVC filters have been the focus of many attorney T.V ads and lawsuits.

IVC Filter Overview

The FDA issued a warning letter to Bard in July 2015 for illegally marketing a device used to remove the Recovery IVC filter, as well as for problems with its Denali IVC filter. In October 2014, all Cook Medical IVC filter lawsuits were centralized as part of an MDL in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana for pretrial proceedings. In August 2015, federal judges centralized lawsuits involving C.R. Bard IVC filters into a Multi-District Litigation (MDL No. 2641) in Arizona under U.S. District .

IVC Lawsuits Are Being Filed For:

C.R. Bard IVC Filter Lawysuits

Recovery IVC Filter (withdrawn in 2005) G2 IVC Filter G2 Express / G2X Filter Eclipse Meridian Denali

Cook IVC Filter Lawsuits

Günther Tulip Celect

If you have been injured by a Bard or Cook IVC filter Contact Us Today

West Palm Beach IVC Filter Alert

Written by Xarelto Helpline on . Posted in Vena Cava Filter, Xarelto News

IVC Filters, Vena Cava Filters, Blood Clot Filter lawyers in West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Boca Raton and Deerfield Beach are alerting seniors to the dangers of the Bard and Cook IVC Filters. IVC filters are implanted to capture blood clots and prevent them from causing pulmonary embolisms and strokes by lodging in the lungs or brain. However, IVC filters have some dangerous side effects and IVC Filter lawsuits are being filed. Complications include: vein and organ perforation, migration and breakage,  broken pieces of filters traveling  through the body causing organ damage. IVC filters are meant to be temporary. Risk of Adverse Events with Long Term Use According To The FDA [Posted 08/09/2010] AUDIENCE: Emergency Medicine, Surgery ISSUE: Since 2005, the FDA has received 921 device adverse event reports involving IVC filters, of which 328 involved device migration, 146 involved embolizations (detachment of device components), 70 involved perforation of the IVC, and 56 involved filter fracture. Some of these events led to adverse clinical outcomes in patients. These types of events may be related to a retrievable filter remaining in the body for long periods of time, beyond the time when the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) has subsided. The FDA is concerned that these retrievable IVC filters, intended for short-term placement, are not always removed once a patient’s risk for PE subsides. Known long term risks associated with IVC filters include but are not limited to lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), filter fracture, filter migration, filter embolization and IVC perforation. BACKGROUND: FDA reviewed the literature and is conducting quantitative decision analysis modeling to evaluate the change in the risk/benefit profile after retrievable IVC filter implantation over time. More information about FDA’s decision analysis model including risk/benefit implantation time frame suggestions will be made available in an update to this communication as well as in a future publication in a peer-reviewed medical journal. RECOMMENDATION: FDA recommends that implanting physicians and clinicians responsible for the ongoing care of patients with retrievable IVC filters consider removing the filter as soon as protection from PE is no longer needed. FDA encourages all physicians involved in the treatment and follow-up of IVC filter recipients to consider the risks and benefits of filter removal for each patient. If a patient has a retrievable IVC filter that should be removed based on his or her individual risk/benefit profile, the primary care physician and/or those providing ongoing patient care should refer the patient for IVC filter removal when feasible and clinically indicated. If you or a loved one has been injured by  a Vena Cava Filter contact our IVC Filter Lawsuit Helpline today.